GitLab

Expert System (AI) is changing education while making finding out more available but likewise triggering arguments on its impact.

While students hail AI tools like ChatGPT for enhancing their knowing experience, lecturers are raising concerns about the growing reliance on AI, which they argue fosters laziness and weakens scholastic stability, bphomesteading.com particularly with numerous students unable to defend their projects or offered works.

Prof. Isaac Nwaogwugwu, a speaker at the University of Lagos, in an interview with Nairametrics, revealed aggravation over the growing reliance on AI-generated reactions among students recounting a recent experience he had.

RelatedStories

Avoid sharing individual information that can identify you with AI tools- Expert warns

Chinese AI app DeepSeek sparks international tech selloff, challenges U.S. AI dominance

"I provided a project to my MBA students, and out of over 100 trainees, about 40% sent the precise very same answers. These students did not even know each other, however they all utilized the same AI tool to generate their actions," he said.

He kept in mind that this trend is widespread amongst both undergraduate and pipewiki.org postgraduate students however is particularly worrying in part-time and distance learning programs.

"AI is a major obstacle when it concerns projects. Many trainees no longer believe critically-they just browse the web, generate answers, and send," he added.

Surprisingly, some speakers are also accused of over-relying on AI, setting a cycle where both educators and students turn to AI for convenience instead of intellectual rigor.

This argument raises important concerns about the role of AI in academic stability and student advancement.

According to a UNESCO report, while ChatGPT reached 100 million monthly active users in January 2023, just one country had actually launched guidelines on generative AI since July 2023.

As of December 2024, ChatGPT had more than 300 million people using the AI chatbot weekly and 1 billion messages sent every day all over the world.

Decline of scholastic rigor

University lecturers are progressively concerned about students sending AI-generated tasks without really understanding the material.

Dr. Felix Echekoba, a lecturer at Nnamdi Azikiwe University, revealed his concerns to Nairametrics about trainees significantly depending on ChatGPT, just to have problem with answering fundamental concerns when checked.

"Many students copy from ChatGPT and send refined projects, however when asked basic questions, they go blank. It's disappointing due to the fact that education has to do with discovering, not simply passing courses," he stated.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu mentioned that the increasing variety of top-notch graduates can not be entirely attributed to AI but admitted that even high-performing trainees use these tools.
"A superior trainee is a superior student, AI or not, but that doesn't indicate they don't cheat. The advantages of AI may be peripheral, but it is making students reliant and less analytical," he said.

- Another lecturer, Dr. Ereke, from Ebonyi State University, raised a various issue that some speakers themselves are guilty of the same practice.
"It's not just trainees using AI slackly. Some lecturers, out of their own laziness, produce lesson notes, course outlines, marking schemes, and even examination questions with AI without examining them. Students in turn use AI to produce answers. It's a cycle of laziness and it is eliminating genuine learning," he regreted.

Students' perspectives on use

Students, on the other hand, state AI has improved their learning experience by making academic materials more understandable and available.

- Eniola Arowosafe, a 300-level Business Administration trainee at Unilag, shared how AI has considerably helped her knowing by breaking down complex terms and supplying summaries of prolonged texts.
"AI assisted me understand things more quickly, particularly when dealing with complex subjects," she explained.

However, she recalled a circumstances when she utilized AI to submit her project, only for her lecturer to immediately recognize that it was created by ChatGPT and reject it. Eniola noted that it was a good-bad effect.

- Bryan Okwuba, who just recently finished with a superior degree in Pharmacy Technology from the University of Lagos, firmly believes that his scholastic success wasn't due to any AI tool. He attributes his impressive grades to actively appealing by asking concerns and concentrating on areas that speakers stress in class, as they are frequently reflected in exam concerns.
"It's everything about being present, paying attention, and tapping into the wealth of knowledge shared by my colleagues," he said,

- Tunde Awoshita, a final-year marketing student at UNIZIK, admits to occasionally copying straight from ChatGPT when facing numerous deadlines.
"To be honest, there are times I copy straight from ChatGPT when I have several due dates, and I understand I'm guilty of that, many times the speakers don't get to read through them, however AI has also helped me find out much faster."

Balancing AI's function in education

Experts think the solution lies in AI literacy; mentor students and lecturers how to use AI as a learning aid instead of a faster way.

- Minister of Education, Dr. Tunji Alausa, highlighted the combination of AI into Nigeria's education system, worrying the significance of a well balanced method that keeps human participation while utilizing AI to improve finding out results.
"As we navigate the rapidly evolving landscape of Expert system (AI), it is crucial that we prioritise human company in education. We need to make sure that AI enhances, rather than replaces, educators' crucial role in forming young minds," he stated

Concerns over AI in Learning

Dorcas Akintade, a cybersecurity change specialist, dealt with growing issues relating to using synthetic intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT and vetlek.ru their prospective dangers to the instructional system.

- She acknowledged the advantages of AI, however, highlighted the requirement for caution in its usage.
- Akintade highlighted the increasing resistance among educators and schools toward incorporating AI tools in finding out environments. She recognized 2 primary reasons why AI tools are dissuaded in instructional settings: security threats and plagiarism. She discussed that AI tools like ChatGPT are trained to respond based on user interactions, which might not align with the expectations of teachers.
"It is not looking at it as a tutor," Akintade stated, discussing that AI does not cater to specific mentor approaches.

Plagiarism is another issue, as AI pulls from existing data, frequently without proper attribution

"A great deal of individuals require to comprehend, like I said, this is data that has been trained on. It is not simply bringing things out from the sky. It's bringing details that some other individuals are fed into it, which in essence indicates that is another individual's documents," she cautioned.

- Additionally, Akintade highlighted an early concern in AI advancement called "hallucination," where AI tools would create details that was not accurate.
"Hallucination meant that it was drawing out info from the air. If ChatGPT could not get that details from you, it was going to make one up," she explained.

She suggested "grounding" AI by supplying it with specific information to avoid such errors.

Navigating AI in Education

Akintade argued that prohibiting AI tools outright is not the service, particularly when AI presents a chance to leapfrog standard educational approaches.

- She thinks that consistently enhancing crucial info helps individuals keep in mind and avoid making mistakes when faced with challenges.
"Immersion brings conversion. When you inform people the exact same thing over and over again, when they are about to make the mistakes, then they'll remember."

She likewise empasized the need for clear policies and procedures within schools, keeping in mind that many schools must address the individuals and process aspects of this use.

- Prof. Nwaogwugwu has resorted to in-class assignments and tests to counter AI-driven scholastic dishonesty.
"Now, I mainly use tasks to ensure trainees provide initial work." However, he acknowledged that handling big classes makes this method challenging.

"If you set complex concerns, trainees won't be able to use AI to get direct responses," he discussed.

He highlighted the requirement for universities to train lecturers on crafting test questions that AI can not quickly solve while acknowledging that some speakers battle to counter AI misuse due to a lack of technological awareness. "Some speakers are analogue," he said.

- Nigeria released a draft National AI Strategy in August 2024, on ethical AI advancement with fairness, transparency, accountability, and privacy at its core.
- UNESCO in a report calls for the policy of AI in education, recommending institutions to examine algorithms, information, and outputs of generative AI tools to ensure they satisfy ethical requirements, protect user information, and filter unsuitable material.
- It worries the need to examine the long-term effect of AI on vital abilities like thinking and creativity while developing policies that line up with ethical frameworks. Additionally, UNESCO suggests implementing age constraints for GenAI usage to secure more youthful students and secure susceptible groups.
- For federal governments, it recommended embracing a collaborated nationwide technique to controling GenAI, including establishing oversight bodies and lining up regulations with existing data security and privacy laws. It stresses assessing AI threats, implementing stricter guidelines for high-risk applications, and guaranteeing nationwide data ownership.